Mr. Ian Whitting Ambassador
Laufásvegur 31
101 Reykjavík Reykjavík
14.05.2010
Your Excellency
As your government prepares for the first Preparatory Committee to
deliberate on the content of an international Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) in July
2010, we write to stress the urgent need for an effective treaty that will stop
irresponsible arms transfers and help stop abuse, save lives, and protect
livelihoods. Thousands of people are killed, injured, raped and forced to flee
from their homes as a result of conflict, armed violence, and human rights
violations and abuses perpetrated using conventional arms. Given that there are only 120 hours of
preparatory committee discussions prior to the negotiating conference in 2012,
it is vital that the meetings in July make real and substantive progress
towards developing key elements of the Treaty.
As a leading champion of the treaty, a major arms exporting
country and a permanent member of the UN Security Council, the
This week from 10th to 16th
May, civil society organisations in over 110 countries are reminding
governments that the poorly regulated global trade in conventional arms and
ammunition has an enormous human cost. Inadequate and loophole-ridden
regulation of international transfers of conventional arms permits such
weapons, equipment and munitions to be supplied to those violating human
rights: destroying lives and threatening livelihoods. The accompanying document
provides a short overview of this ongoing human cost.
A robust ATT will address a glaring gap in international law. While there are treaties to regulate the
international trade of many products, from bananas to dinosaur bones, there are
no global rules for the trade in conventional weapons: products specifically
designed to kill and injure.
Amnesty International believes that a “strong and robust”
treaty with “the highest possible common international standards”, as
mandated by UN General Assembly resolution 64/48, must be one that prohibits
international transfers of arms where
there is credible information indicating a substantial risk that the intended
recipient is likely to use those arms to commit or facilitate grave harm,
including:
- serious violations of international
human rights law or international humanitarian law,
- acts of genocide or crimes against
humanity;
- terrorist attacks;
- gross and systematic armed crime and
violence; and
- actions that seriously undermine
poverty eradication objectives.
We are concerned that some States may propose an ATT which would
significantly weaken these commitments by merely requiring states to “take into
account” a number of “factors” including respect for international human rights
law, international humanitarian law (IHL), terrorism
and organised crime. Such weak parameters would be a dangerous backward step
from current
We also welcome the
·
all types of conventional military, security and
police armaments, weapons and related materiel, including small arms and light
weapons;
·
conventional ammunition and explosives used for the
aforementioned;
·
weapons, ammunition and equipment deployed in the
use of force by police and security forces;
·
components, expertise and equipment essential for the
production, maintenance and use of the aforementioned; and
·
dual-use
items that can have a military, security and police application.
To avoid loopholes, the Treaty must also regulate
all types of international transfer (import, export, transit, gifts, loans and
other transfers) and the transactions essential for a transfer in each case
(including brokering activity).
Transparency in the international arms trade must be enhanced
through robust reporting and record keeping provisions. To ensure effective implementation, the
Treaty should enforcement and dispute resolution mechanisms, and procedures for
international cooperation and assistance.
We would like to call on the
Yours sincerely,
Jóhanna K. Eyjólfsdóttir
Director
Amnesty International Icelandic section